Bhagavan: Hindu Daily Practice
Epics, Gita, Yoga, Horoscope
Your score
Shaky. 7 of 43 checks need attention.
Bhagavan: Hindu Daily Practice
Reference · US
- Discoverability68.4
Top 5 for 2 of 6 terms · 95% of characters
- First impression75.8
icon 67, shot 1 88, subtitle 70 of 100
- Credibility76.2
4.8★ from 37 ratings
- Clarity60.7
3 of 6 viewers described it correctly
- Competitiveness21.8
Picked 0 of 2 shelf runs · 39th pct
Working
- Your app name uses 30 of 30 characters. That's a good use of the highest-weighted field you have.
- You have a subtitle. Good, most indie apps don't.
Not working
- You're publishing in one language, and the United States storefront supports 9 more. Each missing one is another 30-character name, 30-character subtitle and 100-character keyword field: 1,440 indexable characters you're leaving on the table in the same storefront, without translating your app. Missing: Arabic, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), French, Korean, Portuguese (Brazil), Russian, Spanish (Mexico), Vietnamese.
- You have 37 ratings; the median of the five apps you're competing with is 338. Side by side on a search shelf, that gap is the first thing a cautious user notices.
Leaderboard rank
See the full board →- #50Chess ∙63.9

- #51Bhagavan: Hindu Daily Practicethis app63.8

- #52Pixel – 90s 8Bit Retro Camera63.1

The shelf
3 of 3 simulated users picked a rival off this row.
Search results · US · Reference
They were asked to find: “You need to look things up quickly and trust the answer you get.”
Your taps
Where the taps went
- Diya - Daily Hindu Practice4/6
- Simran: Daily Sikh Practice1/6
- Daily Philosophy1/6
- Bhagavan: Hindu Daily Practiceyou0/6
Fix these first
5 changes, in order of impact.
Category choice sanity
Nothing in your name, subtitle or description sounds like a Reference app. Both categories are indexed, and App Review treats an irrelevant category as grounds for rejection. Check that this is really where you belong, and if it is, say so in your own words. Make sure your primary category matches what your listing says you do, and set a secondary category. Both are indexed, and an irrelevant one is grounds for rejection.
visibilityApple-documentedRating count vs the top 5
You have 37 ratings; the median of the five apps you're competing with is 338. Side by side on a search shelf, that gap is the first thing a cautious user notices. Ask for ratings in-app at a moment the user is happy. iOS shows no download counts, so your rating count is the only popularity proof a stranger can see.
conversionIndustry consensusCross-index locales unused
You're publishing in one language, and the United States storefront supports 9 more. Each missing one is another 30-character name, 30-character subtitle and 100-character keyword field: 1,440 indexable characters you're leaving on the table in the same storefront, without translating your app. Missing: Arabic, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), French, Korean, Portuguese (Brazil), Russian, Spanish (Mexico), Vietnamese. Add metadata in your storefront's additional supported languages. Each one is another 160 indexable characters (30 name + 30 subtitle + 100 keywords) in the same storefront.
visibilityIndustry consensusApp preview video
+10–20% est.No preview video, so your first three screenshots carry the search card alone. Roughly 90% of even top-1,000 apps have never tested a video, so a decent one is still an unclaimed lever, as long as the poster frame stands on its own. Test one 15–30s preview whose poster frame stands on its own. A weak poster frame evicts a screenshot and is worse than no video.
conversionStrong evidenceDescription first sentence
Your first sentence is no word describing what the reader gets. It's the only line shown before "more", and under 2% of visitors ever tap "more". Rewrite it as one short statement of what someone gets out of the app. Rewrite the first sentence as one short outcome statement. It is the only line shown before 'more', and fewer than 2% of visitors ever tap 'more'.
conversionStrong evidence
What simulated users said
2 of 6 would tap your card; 0 of 6 would install.
Skeptical Researcher
38, product manager · reads the one-stars first (the control persona)
“The rating is high enough to trust, I don't see any complaints on the card, and the interface looks clean and current.”
- The card
- would tap
- The page
- did not open it
Skeptical Researcher
38, product manager · reads the one-stars first (the control persona)
“The core complaint here is that spiritual practice shouldn't have a price tag, and I'm not seeing the developer address that.”
- The card
- would not tap
- The page
- did not open it
Price-Sensitive Pragmatist
29, gig worker · goes straight to the in-app purchase list
“It says free but the IAP tag tells me I'm going to hit a paywall, so I'm moving on.”
- The card
- would not tap
- The page
- did not open it
Price-Sensitive Pragmatist
29, gig worker · goes straight to the in-app purchase list
“I can see the free part works for some people, but the first thing in their IAP list is a weekly subscription, and someone's already left a review about subscription trouble.”
- The card
- would not tap
- The page
- did not open it
Power User
31, developer · actually reads the description
“The screenshots show actual features and structure instead of just marketing language, so I'd open it to see what's behind the free tier before deciding on the in-app purchases.”
- The card
- would tap
- The page
- did not open it
Power User
31, developer · actually reads the description
“The structure is there, but I'm looking at marketing cards and a horoscope, not evidence of what I'd actually be reading or learning.”
- The card
- would not tap
- The page
- did not open it