Swipeshare: Meal-Sharing App
No swipe left behind.
Your score
Shaky. 12 of 43 checks need attention.
Swipeshare: Meal-Sharing App
Social Networking · US
- Discoverability63
Top 5 for 1 of 6 terms · 76% of characters
- First impression66.1
icon 83, shot 1 42, subtitle 80 of 100
- Credibility69.4
5.0★ from 1 ratings · no review themes
- Clarity64.3
3 of 6 viewers described it correctly
- Competitiveness57.9
Picked 2 of 4 shelf runs · 51st pct
Working
- Your app name uses 28 of 30 characters. That's a good use of the highest-weighted field you have.
- You have a subtitle. Good, most indie apps don't.
Not working
- "venmo" shows up in your description. Comparison claims about named competitors are a review risk, and in the keyword field they're also characters buying you nothing.
- You're publishing in one language, and the United States storefront supports 9 more. Each missing one is another 30-character name, 30-character subtitle and 100-character keyword field: 1,440 indexable characters you're leaving on the table in the same storefront, without translating your app. Missing: Arabic, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), French, Korean, Portuguese (Brazil), Russian, Spanish (Mexico), Vietnamese.
Leaderboard rank
See the full board →- #47Versy Music65.5

- #48Swipeshare: Meal-Sharing Appthis app64.3

- #49Peerform64.1

The shelf
2 of 3 simulated users picked a rival off this row.
Search results · US · Social Networking
They were asked to find: “You want to keep up with a small group of people without the noise of a big network.”
Your taps
Where the taps went
- eHumility3/6
- Swipeshare: Meal-Sharing Appyou2/6
- Behindit1/6
Fix these first
5 changes, in order of impact.
Description keyword stuffing
The word "meal" makes up 5.5% of your description: 6 times in 110 words. Descriptions aren't keyword-indexed on iOS, so this buys you exactly nothing in search and reads as spam to the few people who open it. Stop repeating keywords in the description. It is not indexed on iOS, so stuffing it costs you readability and buys you nothing.
conversionIndustry consensusRating count vs the top 5
You have 1 rating against a top-5 median of 17. Under about 25 ratings, even a 4.8 average reads as unproven. This is a volume problem, not a quality one. Ask for ratings in-app at a moment the user is happy. iOS shows no download counts, so your rating count is the only popularity proof a stranger can see.
conversionIndustry consensusCompetitor brand names in metadata
"venmo" shows up in your description. Comparison claims about named competitors are a review risk, and in the keyword field they're also characters buying you nothing. Remove other companies' brand names from your metadata. This is a rejection risk, not just wasted characters.
visibilityApple-documentedScreenshot count
+10–20% est.You have 4 screenshots out of a possible 10. Most top apps run five. The extra ones cost you nothing and carry the story for the 40% of visitors who actually scroll. Ship at least 5 screenshots, and never fewer than 3. The first 1–3 are the entire search-result unit for the ~65% of downloads that happen straight from search.
conversionStrong evidenceCross-index locales unused
You're publishing in one language, and the United States storefront supports 9 more. Each missing one is another 30-character name, 30-character subtitle and 100-character keyword field: 1,440 indexable characters you're leaving on the table in the same storefront, without translating your app. Missing: Arabic, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), French, Korean, Portuguese (Brazil), Russian, Spanish (Mexico), Vietnamese. Add metadata in your storefront's additional supported languages. Each one is another 160 indexable characters (30 name + 30 subtitle + 100 keywords) in the same storefront.
visibilityIndustry consensus
What simulated users said
1 of 6 would tap your card; 0 of 6 would install.
Skeptical Researcher
38, product manager · reads the one-stars first (the control persona)
“A perfect 5-star rating from a single user tells me nothing about whether this app actually works.”
- The card
- would not tap
- The page
- did not open it
Skeptical Researcher
38, product manager · reads the one-stars first (the control persona)
“One rating from one person doesn't tell me anything, and I'm not installing something this new without being able to actually look at what went wrong for other people.”
- The card
- would not tap
- The page
- did not open it
Impulse Scroller
19, student · installs several apps a week, deletes most of them
“The icon looks current and the first screenshot immediately explains the problem it solves, so I'm tapping to see what's actually in here.”
- The card
- would tap
- The page
- did not open it
Impulse Scroller
19, student · installs several apps a week, deletes most of them
“Cool concept if you go there, but I'm not spending storage on something I literally can't use.”
- The card
- would not tap
- The page
- did not open it
Price-Sensitive Pragmatist
29, gig worker · goes straight to the in-app purchase list
“It says free but then tells you swipes cost money, so it's not actually free and I'm not digging deeper into what else costs.”
- The card
- would not tap
- The page
- would install
Price-Sensitive Pragmatist
29, gig worker · goes straight to the in-app purchase list
“Free app, but I'm still spending money on every transaction, so it doesn't matter that the download is free.”
- The card
- would not tap
- The page
- would install