Read This For Me: Scan Text
Simplify Documents & Reminders
Your score
Shaky. 7 of 43 checks need attention.
Read This For Me: Scan Text
Productivity · US
- Discoverability44.4
Outranked on all 6 terms · 97% of characters
- First impression95.2
icon 100, shot 1 100, subtitle 85 of 100
- Credibility41.9
Unrated. Scored on freshness and reviews only
- Clarity100
6 of 6 viewers described it correctly
- Competitiveness10.4
Picked 0 of 2 shelf runs · 26th pct
Working
- Your app name uses 27 of 30 characters. That's a good use of the highest-weighted field you have.
- You have a subtitle. Good, most indie apps don't.
Not working
- You're publishing in one language, and the United States storefront supports 9 more. Each missing one is another 30-character name, 30-character subtitle and 100-character keyword field: 1,440 indexable characters you're leaving on the table in the same storefront, without translating your app. Missing: Arabic, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), French, Korean, Portuguese (Brazil), Russian, Spanish (Mexico), Vietnamese.
- You have 0 ratings against a top-5 median of 2,729. Under about 25 ratings, even a 4.8 average reads as unproven. This is a volume problem, not a quality one.
Leaderboard rank
See the full board →- #55intelli.coach59.8

- #56Read This For Me: Scan Textthis app59.8

- #57Driftwood: Hard Talk Rehearsal59.0

The shelf
3 of 3 simulated users picked a rival off this row.
Search results · US · Productivity
They were asked to find: “You keep letting things fall through the cracks at work and want somewhere to put them that you will actually open again.”
Your taps
Where the taps went
- AI Scanner : Image to Text4/6
- Reminders2/6
- Read This For Me: Scan Textyou0/6
Fix these first
5 changes, in order of impact.
Rating count vs the top 5
You have 0 ratings against a top-5 median of 2,729. Under about 25 ratings, even a 4.8 average reads as unproven. This is a volume problem, not a quality one. Ask for ratings in-app at a moment the user is happy. iOS shows no download counts, so your rating count is the only popularity proof a stranger can see.
conversionIndustry consensusSocial proof is the weakest part of your listing
Social proof scores 0/100. Weakest: 0.00★; ~50% of users won't consider a 3★ app; 95% of featured apps are 4.0+; 0 ratings vs a top-5 median of 2,729 (0%). What the review actually saw: 0.00★; ~50% of users won't consider a 3★ app; 95% of featured apps are 4.0+; 0 ratings vs a top-5 median of 2,729 (0%).
conversionOur proposalCross-index locales unused
You're publishing in one language, and the United States storefront supports 9 more. Each missing one is another 30-character name, 30-character subtitle and 100-character keyword field: 1,440 indexable characters you're leaving on the table in the same storefront, without translating your app. Missing: Arabic, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), French, Korean, Portuguese (Brazil), Russian, Spanish (Mexico), Vietnamese. Add metadata in your storefront's additional supported languages. Each one is another 160 indexable characters (30 name + 30 subtitle + 100 keywords) in the same storefront.
visibilityIndustry consensus6 of 6 first impressions ended in a bounce
They gave these reasons: "No ratings at all means I have nothing to go on, and I'm not paying $3.99 to be the first person to find out if it works."; "No ratings at all means I have nothing to go on, and I'm not paying $3.99 to be the first person to find out if this works."; "No ratings to signal this is real or stable, and the listing tells me nothing concrete about how the scanning or reminder logic works — just slogans.".
conversionOur proposalApp preview video
+10–20% est.No preview video, so your first three screenshots carry the search card alone. Roughly 90% of even top-1,000 apps have never tested a video, so a decent one is still an unclaimed lever, as long as the poster frame stands on its own. Test one 15–30s preview whose poster frame stands on its own. A weak poster frame evicts a screenshot and is worse than no video.
conversionStrong evidence
What simulated users said
0 of 6 would tap your card; 0 of 6 would install.
Skeptical Researcher
38, product manager · reads the one-stars first (the control persona)
“Zero ratings on a paid app is a hard pass — I need to see that someone else has already taken the risk.”
- The card
- would not tap
- The page
- did not open it
Skeptical Researcher
38, product manager · reads the one-stars first (the control persona)
“Zero ratings on a paid app is a hard pass — I need to see what actual people got out of it before I spend money on it.”
- The card
- would not tap
- The page
- did not open it
Power User
31, developer · actually reads the description
“The screenshots prove the feature exists, but I'm not installing an unrated app based on vague marketing language.”
- The card
- would not tap
- The page
- did not open it
Power User
31, developer · actually reads the description
“I can't trust an app when the update history doesn't make sense.”
- The card
- would not tap
- The page
- did not open it
Busy Parent
41, two kids · decides in stolen moments outside a bedroom door
“I'm not installing something that nobody's used before — I need to know it's solid first.”
- The card
- would not tap
- The page
- did not open it
Busy Parent
41, two kids · decides in stolen moments outside a bedroom door
“I'm not paying four dollars for something nobody's ever used before.”
- The card
- would not tap
- The page
- did not open it